Ever So Tweetly

    follow me on Twitter

    Saturday, June 10, 2006

    Newswire: Don't be fooled by the USDA's newest NAIS document

    "OUR ANSWER TO THE USDA's NEW NAIS "GUIDE for SMALL-SCALE orNON-COMMERCIAL PRODUCERS" - WE WILL NOT BE FOOLED!
    By Mary Zanoni,
    P.O. Box 501,
    Canton, New York 13617

    On June 2, 2006, the USDA released a new document entitled "The National Animal Identification System: A Guide for Small-Scale or Non-Commercial Producers".Now that the concerns of farmers, ranchers and animal owners are finallygetting some attention from the USDA, the USDA is trying to undercut opposition by releasing this feel-good, double-talking, misleadingdocument. Here are major points about the Guide that animal owners and farmers must be wary of.

    1. Do not rely on NAIS "Working Groups" to represent your concerns. The USDA is desperately trying to get citizens opposed to NAIS to talk to these working groups. Why? BECAUSE CONGRESS IS THREATENING TO COMPLETELY DE-FUND NAIS AND USDA DESPERATELY WANTS TO STOP CITIZENS FROM CONTACTING CONGRESS - SEECONTACT YOUR U.S. SENATOR BELOW. Do not bother with these Species Working Groups -They are the same people who sold you out by agreeing to NAIS all along.

    2. USDA's claim in the GUIDE that NAIS is "voluntary" is just as untruthful as the same claim in the Implementation Plan. Remember, the NAIS Implementation Plan released on April 6, 2006 says that USDA will make NAIS mandatory if theydo not get "FULL COMPLIANCE" in the "voluntary" program.. It is truly sad to see a government agency proceeding on the assumption that Americans can be fooled by such an obvious ploy. Even now, the USDA is building a giant, federal database with premises information submitted by the states and states have taken much of that information without informing the animal owners.

    3. USDA for the first time admits that all animal owners will be charged a fee every time they have to report to the Animal Tracking Databases. The Guidestates: "Because the animal tracking database infrastructure is still being developed and it is to be privately held, it is difficult to discuss costs for this part of NAIS with any accuracy. But, because these will be privately held databases, we anticipate that producers will have various options and that competition among databases will help keep costs down." (Guide, p. 9; emphasis added.)

    There it is, folks - you can expect that those "private" members of the"public/private partnership" who will have a choke hold on the Animal Tracking Databases will be charging you whatever the traffic will bear, everytime you buy, sell, tag, retag, slaughter, etc. etc. every single animal. Oh, and that "competition among databases" that the USDA vaguely hopes might "keep costs down"? Well, one of the first private databases is being constructed by Microsoft, to whom we owe the wonderfully competitive market for computer operating systems and applications software.

    IF THE USDA IS ALLOWED TO CREATE NAIS, IT WILL BE A BOTTOMLESS PIT DOWNWHICH THE FEDS, THE STATES, AND EVERY FARMER AND ANIMAL OWNER IN AMERICAWILL BEFOREVER THROWING CASH

    Here's how to really send a message to the USDA: The U.S. Senate is presently considering funding for the USDA for nextyear. CONTACT YOUR U.S. SENATOR with a simple and clear message:"TOTALLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY DE-FUND USDA's NAIS (the NATIONAL ANIMALIDENTIFICATION SYSTEM) NOW"

    No comments: